CANDY-COATED DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS vs CALIFORNIA ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CALIFORNIA ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
CANDY-COATED DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS: 4
vs
CALIFORNIA ALMONDS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANDY-COATED DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 56.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANDY-COATED DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANDY-COATED DARK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS | CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 60 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.7 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 370 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 429 MG |