CANDIED SWEET POTATOES SAUCED YAMS vs SHOESTRING BEETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANDIED SWEET POTATOES SAUCED YAMS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CANDIED SWEET POTATOES SAUCED YAMS: 6
vs
SHOESTRING BEETS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANDIED SWEET POTATOES SAUCED YAMS | SHOESTRING BEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 108 cal | 33 cal | |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 0.8 g | |
| Carbs | 25.2 g | 4.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANDIED SWEET POTATOES SAUCED YAMS | SHOESTRING BEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANDIED SWEET POTATOES SAUCED YAMS | SHOESTRING BEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 187 MG | 86 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 22 MG | 208 MG |