Campbell's Slow Kettle Style Tomato & Sweet Basil Bisque vs Progresso Traditional Potato
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Progresso Traditional Potato wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
Campbell's Slow Kettle Style Tomato & Sweet Basil Bisque: 4
vs
Progresso Traditional Potato: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Campbell's Slow Kettle Style Tomato & Sweet Basil Bisque | Progresso Traditional Potato | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 110 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.6 g | |
| Carbs | 12.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 5.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Campbell's Slow Kettle Style Tomato & Sweet Basil Bisque | Progresso Traditional Potato | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Campbell's Slow Kettle Style Tomato & Sweet Basil Bisque | Progresso Traditional Potato | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 180 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 322 MG | 286 MG |