BUTTERFLAKE ROLLS vs TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUTTERFLAKE ROLLS: 4
vs
TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUTTERFLAKE ROLLS | TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 395 cal | 291 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 10.1 g | |
| Carbs | 29.0 g | 50.6 g | |
| Fat | 29.0 g | 5.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUTTERFLAKE ROLLS | TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 6.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUTTERFLAKE ROLLS | TRADITIONAL WHITE POCKET-LESS PITA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 101 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 447 MG | 392 MG |