BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS vs WHITE BEAN CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE BEAN CHIPS wins in 9 out of 11 nutrient categories
BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS: 0
vs
WHITE BEAN CHIPS: 9
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | WHITE BEAN CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 53.6 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | WHITE BEAN CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BURTS THICK CUT HAND COOKED POTATO CHIPS | WHITE BEAN CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 536 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 339 MG | 500 MG |