BUN SIZE FRANKS vs SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BUN SIZE FRANKS: 3
vs
SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN SIZE FRANKS | SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 176 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 16.2 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN SIZE FRANKS | SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN SIZE FRANKS | SWEET APPLE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 471 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,036 MG | 515 MG |