BUN LENGTH FRANKS vs ""TOMATO"" PORK BANGERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
""TOMATO"" PORK BANGERS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 2
vs
""TOMATO"" PORK BANGERS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | ""TOMATO"" PORK BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 326 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 13.2 g | |
| Carbs | 11.6 g | 9.2 g | |
| Fat | 25.6 g | 6.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | ""TOMATO"" PORK BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUN LENGTH FRANKS | ""TOMATO"" PORK BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,209 MG | 436 MG |