BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN HOT WING SECTIONS COATED WITH A FLAVORFUL HOT vs RESTAURANT STYLE LIGHTLY BATTERED GREEN BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RESTAURANT STYLE LIGHTLY BATTERED GREEN BEANS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN HOT WING SECTIONS COATED WITH A FLAVORFUL HOT: 4
vs
RESTAURANT STYLE LIGHTLY BATTERED GREEN BEANS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN HOT WING SECTIONS COATED WITH A FLAVORFUL HOT | RESTAURANT STYLE LIGHTLY BATTERED GREEN BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 226 cal | 202 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 23.8 g | |
| Fat | 15.5 g | 9.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN HOT WING SECTIONS COATED WITH A FLAVORFUL HOT | RESTAURANT STYLE LIGHTLY BATTERED GREEN BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BUFFALO STYLE CHICKEN HOT WING SECTIONS COATED WITH A FLAVORFUL HOT | RESTAURANT STYLE LIGHTLY BATTERED GREEN BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 190 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 905 MG | 524 MG |