BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK vs 80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK: 3
vs
80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | 80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 188 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | 80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | 80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 67 MG |