BOSTON BAKED BEANS vs NATURAL WHOLE ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL WHOLE ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BOSTON BAKED BEANS: 3
vs
NATURAL WHOLE ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BOSTON BAKED BEANS | NATURAL WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 447 cal | 607 cal | |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 76.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 15.8 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BOSTON BAKED BEANS | NATURAL WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BOSTON BAKED BEANS | NATURAL WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 286 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 105 MG | 0 MG |