BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD-CAUGHT SALMON PORTIONS vs WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD-CAUGHT SALMON PORTIONS: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD-CAUGHT SALMON PORTIONS | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 22.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD-CAUGHT SALMON PORTIONS | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 13 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD-CAUGHT SALMON PORTIONS | WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 339 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 35 MG |