BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON vs ATLANTIC SALMON IN WATER FILLET PORTIONS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON: 4
vs
ATLANTIC SALMON IN WATER FILLET PORTIONS: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | ATLANTIC SALMON IN WATER FILLET PORTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 202 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 13.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS & SKINLESS WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | ATLANTIC SALMON IN WATER FILLET PORTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 376 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 282 MG | 272 MG |