BONELESS HAM STEAK vs COOKED THIN SLICED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED THIN SLICED HAM wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BONELESS HAM STEAK: 2
vs
COOKED THIN SLICED HAM: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS HAM STEAK | COOKED THIN SLICED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS HAM STEAK | COOKED THIN SLICED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS HAM STEAK | COOKED THIN SLICED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 938 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,143 MG | 696 MG |