BOLOGNA WITH CHICKEN AND PORK vs CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BOLOGNA WITH CHICKEN AND PORK: 3
vs
CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BOLOGNA WITH CHICKEN AND PORK | CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 342 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 29.0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BOLOGNA WITH CHICKEN AND PORK | CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BOLOGNA WITH CHICKEN AND PORK | CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 105 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,158 MG | 946 MG |