BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK vs ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK: 2
vs
ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK | ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK | ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BNLS BEEF BOTTOM ROUND STEAK | ORIGINAL PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 58 MG | 241 MG |