BLUEBACK RED SALMON SALT ADDED vs TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
BLUEBACK RED SALMON SALT ADDED: 0
vs
TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON: 0
(10 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUEBACK RED SALMON SALT ADDED | TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 175 cal | 175 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 20.6 g | 20.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 11.1 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLUEBACK RED SALMON SALT ADDED | TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUEBACK RED SALMON SALT ADDED | TRADITIONAL STYLE SOCKEYE RED SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 159 MG | 159 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 429 MG | Tie |