BLUE HILL BAY vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BLUE HILL BAY: 3
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLUE HILL BAY | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 141 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 24.7 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 4.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLUE HILL BAY | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLUE HILL BAY | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 616 MG | 565 MG |