BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM vs TERIYAKI SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM: 5
vs
TERIYAKI SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | TERIYAKI SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 15.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | TERIYAKI SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK FOREST COOKED HAM | TERIYAKI SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,393 MG | 321 MG |