BITTER-SWEET ORANGE MARMALADE vs PUGET SOUND JAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BITTER-SWEET ORANGE MARMALADE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BITTER-SWEET ORANGE MARMALADE: 5
vs
PUGET SOUND JAMS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BITTER-SWEET ORANGE MARMALADE | PUGET SOUND JAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 947 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 15.8 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 189.5 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 21.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 15.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BITTER-SWEET ORANGE MARMALADE | PUGET SOUND JAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 32 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BITTER-SWEET ORANGE MARMALADE | PUGET SOUND JAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 105 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 9.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,158 MG | 0 MG |