BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE vs MILK CHOCOLATE WITH HAZELNUT FILLING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 7
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE WITH HAZELNUT FILLING: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MILK CHOCOLATE WITH HAZELNUT FILLING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 485 cal | 595 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 60.6 g | 59.5 g | |
| Fat | 24.2 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MILK CHOCOLATE WITH HAZELNUT FILLING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MILK CHOCOLATE WITH HAZELNUT FILLING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 61 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.4 MG | 4.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 333 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 136 MG | 71 MG |