BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE vs MILK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 6
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS CANDY: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MILK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 485 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 60.6 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 24.2 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MILK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | MILK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 61 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 136 MG | 33 MG |