BILL JOHNSON'S vs NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
BILL JOHNSON'S: 4
vs
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BILL JOHNSON'S | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 31.3 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BILL JOHNSON'S | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.5 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BILL JOHNSON'S | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) BRAND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 200 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 812 MG | 1,933 MG |