BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS vs ALASKA POLLOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKA POLLOCK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 2
vs
ALASKA POLLOCK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS | ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 225 cal | 44 cal | |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 14.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 13.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS | ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLETS | ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 176 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 343 MG | 664 MG |