BEER BATTERED FILLETS vs COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEER BATTERED FILLETS: 2
vs
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 cal | 95 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 21 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 119 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 590 MG | 226 MG |