BEER BATTERED FILLETS vs COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEER BATTERED FILLETS: 2
vs
COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 23.8 g | |
| Carbs | 21 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 590 MG | 208 MG |