BEER BATTERED FILLETS vs ALASKA WILD CAUGHT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKA WILD CAUGHT wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEER BATTERED FILLETS: 3
vs
ALASKA WILD CAUGHT: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | ALASKA WILD CAUGHT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 18.2 g | |
| Carbs | 21 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | ALASKA WILD CAUGHT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEER BATTERED FILLETS | ALASKA WILD CAUGHT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 12 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 388 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 590 MG | 74 MG |