BEEF FRANKS vs WATERHILL NATURALS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WATERHILL NATURALS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
WATERHILL NATURALS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | WATERHILL NATURALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 265 cal | 232 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 24.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | WATERHILL NATURALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | WATERHILL NATURALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 643 MG |