BEEF FRANKS vs UNCURED BISON HOTDOG
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED BISON HOTDOG wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF FRANKS: 2
vs
UNCURED BISON HOTDOG: 8
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED BISON HOTDOG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 319 cal | 176 cal | |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 28.3 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED BISON HOTDOG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FRANKS | UNCURED BISON HOTDOG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 496 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 876 MG | 294 MG |