BEEF FILLET 8OZ C/C N.R. vs TNDRLN FILLET SEL C/C 4OZ
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TNDRLN FILLET SEL C/C 4OZ wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEEF FILLET 8OZ C/C N.R.: 3
vs
TNDRLN FILLET SEL C/C 4OZ: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEEF FILLET 8OZ C/C N.R. | TNDRLN FILLET SEL C/C 4OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 204 cal | 152 cal | |
| Protein | 28.3 g | 22.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEEF FILLET 8OZ C/C N.R. | TNDRLN FILLET SEL C/C 4OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEEF FILLET 8OZ C/C N.R. | TNDRLN FILLET SEL C/C 4OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 348 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 54 MG |