BAY SCALLOPS vs WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BAY SCALLOPS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BAY SCALLOPS: 5
vs
WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BAY SCALLOPS | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 111 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BAY SCALLOPS | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BAY SCALLOPS | WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 319 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 257 MG | 66 MG |