BATTERED ONION RINGS vs CRISPY CRINKLE CUT FRIES FRENCH FRIED POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
BATTERED ONION RINGS: 5
vs
CRISPY CRINKLE CUT FRIES FRENCH FRIED POTATOES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BATTERED ONION RINGS | CRISPY CRINKLE CUT FRIES FRENCH FRIED POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 129 cal | |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 1.2 g | |
| Carbs | 31.8 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 11.4 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BATTERED ONION RINGS | CRISPY CRINKLE CUT FRIES FRENCH FRIED POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BATTERED ONION RINGS | CRISPY CRINKLE CUT FRIES FRENCH FRIED POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 12 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 306 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 443 MG | 412 MG |