BAKEN-ETS vs ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS wins in 5 out of 13 nutrient categories
BAKEN-ETS: 4
vs
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BAKEN-ETS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 409 cal | |
| Protein | 60 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 77.3 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BAKEN-ETS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 9.1 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BAKEN-ETS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,533 MG | 477 MG |