BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS vs ITALIAN-STYLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN-STYLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS: 3
vs
ITALIAN-STYLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS | ITALIAN-STYLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 170 cal | 221 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 23.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 10.3 g | |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 10.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS | ITALIAN-STYLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 59 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 544 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 412 MG |