BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS vs CHOPHOUSE BLEND BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS MEALS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPHOUSE BLEND BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS MEALS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS: 2
vs
CHOPHOUSE BLEND BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS MEALS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS | CHOPHOUSE BLEND BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS MEALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 170 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS | CHOPHOUSE BLEND BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS MEALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS | CHOPHOUSE BLEND BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS MEALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 384 MG |