BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS vs 85% LEAN | 15% FAT ANGUS GROUND BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS: 4
vs
85% LEAN | 15% FAT ANGUS GROUND BEEF: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS | 85% LEAN | 15% FAT ANGUS GROUND BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 170 cal | 196 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 20.5 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAKS | 85% LEAN | 15% FAT ANGUS GROUND BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 295 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 58 MG |