BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK vs ORGANIC GROUND PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK: 6
vs
ORGANIC GROUND PORK: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | ORGANIC GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 259 cal | |
| Protein | 21.8 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | ORGANIC GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | ORGANIC GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 26 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 328 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 218 MG | 49 MG |