BACON & CHEDDAR NATURAL CASING SMOKED SAUSAGE vs BEEF UNCURED FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF UNCURED FRANKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACON & CHEDDAR NATURAL CASING SMOKED SAUSAGE: 3
vs
BEEF UNCURED FRANKS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON & CHEDDAR NATURAL CASING SMOKED SAUSAGE | BEEF UNCURED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 351 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 4 g | |
| Fat | 32.4 g | 26 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON & CHEDDAR NATURAL CASING SMOKED SAUSAGE | BEEF UNCURED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON & CHEDDAR NATURAL CASING SMOKED SAUSAGE | BEEF UNCURED FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 560 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 689 MG | 920 MG |