BACK TO NATURE vs FONTE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FONTE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACK TO NATURE: 4
vs
FONTE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACK TO NATURE | FONTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 69.2 g | 57.5 g | |
| Fat | 19.2 g | 11.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACK TO NATURE | FONTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACK TO NATURE | FONTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 154 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 365 MG | 138 MG |