ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB vs SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB: 1
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 16.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 16.2 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ATLANTIC SALMON PORTION WITH MAPLE BACON RUB | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 85 MG | 212 MG |