ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET vs CHICKEN RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN RINGS wins in 8 out of 10 nutrient categories
ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET: 0
vs
CHICKEN RINGS: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | CHICKEN RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 353 cal | 228 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 15.2 g | |
| Carbs | 18.8 g | 16.3 g | |
| Fat | 24.7 g | 12.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | CHICKEN RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | CHICKEN RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 43 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 682 MG | 804 MG |