APPLE BANANA SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH vs GREAT LAKES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GREAT LAKES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
APPLE BANANA SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH: 3
vs
GREAT LAKES: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | APPLE BANANA SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | GREAT LAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 15.6 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 15 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | APPLE BANANA SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | GREAT LAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 13.3 MG | 3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | APPLE BANANA SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | GREAT LAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 200 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 144 MG | 675 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 100 MG |