ANGUS BEEF FRANKS vs RED HOT LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED HOT LINKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
RED HOT LINKS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 288 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.9 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 28.9 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | RED HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,096 MG | 875 MG |