ANCIENT GRAINS WITH KALE vs SWEET RELISH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANCIENT GRAINS WITH KALE wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
ANCIENT GRAINS WITH KALE: 5
vs
SWEET RELISH: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ANCIENT GRAINS WITH KALE | SWEET RELISH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 30.9 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 10.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ANCIENT GRAINS WITH KALE | SWEET RELISH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 22.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ANCIENT GRAINS WITH KALE | SWEET RELISH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 176 MG | 933 MG |