ALMONDS vs TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ALMONDS: 6
vs
TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMONDS | TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMONDS | TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 357 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 2,571 MG |