ALMOND FIG BAKED OATMEAL vs COCOBURG
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COCOBURG wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
ALMOND FIG BAKED OATMEAL: 5
vs
COCOBURG: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND FIG BAKED OATMEAL | COCOBURG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 283 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 28.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND FIG BAKED OATMEAL | COCOBURG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 32.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND FIG BAKED OATMEAL | COCOBURG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,929 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 571 MG |