ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 3
vs
MACKEREL: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 158 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 22.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 235 MG | 439 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 329 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 306 MG | 491 MG |