ALASKAN SOCKEYE WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLET vs ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
ALASKAN SOCKEYE WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLET: 4
vs
ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKAN SOCKEYE WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLET | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 cal | 218 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 10.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fat | 8.6 g | 12.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKAN SOCKEYE WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLET | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKAN SOCKEYE WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLET | ENGLISH STYLE WILD CAUGHT BATTERED HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 10 MG | 23 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 48 MG | 448 MG |