ALASKA SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON vs CANNED MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANNED MACKEREL wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ALASKA SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON: 1
vs
CANNED MACKEREL: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKA SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON | CANNED MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 177 cal | 140 cal | |
| Protein | 24.2 g | 17 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKA SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON | CANNED MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKA SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON | CANNED MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 300 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 435 MG | 710 MG |