ALASKA PINK SALMON vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
ALASKA PINK SALMON: 5
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKA PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKA PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 30 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKA PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 224 MG | 179 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 318 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 353 MG | 464 MG |