AHOLD vs MARBLE BLUE JACK BURGER STACKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARBLE BLUE JACK BURGER STACKS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
AHOLD: 3
vs
MARBLE BLUE JACK BURGER STACKS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AHOLD | MARBLE BLUE JACK BURGER STACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 292 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 20.8 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 4.2 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 20.8 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AHOLD | MARBLE BLUE JACK BURGER STACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | AHOLD | MARBLE BLUE JACK BURGER STACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 625 MG | 929 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 161 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 708 MG | 429 MG |